After 52 Years On The Run, Bank Robber Confesses To Family On Deathbed
![After 52 Years On The Run, Bank Robber Confesses To Family On Deathbed](https://static.dailysquared.com/posts/a553c4fc5ef498dc2d3bd20a50839f5e_28585_400.jpg)
Apparently, the daughter made some major upgrades, thereby increasing the value of the house. So, how do they settle this?
Inheriting a home from a beloved parent who has passed on can be both a blessing and a bittersweet reminder of their absence. Our narrator (Original Poster) found themselves in this very situation, having inherited a house from their mother years ago.
Though it was far from the latest modern design, it was still in good condition. This same house soon became a lifeline for their daughter and her husband, who had fallen on hard times.
Two years ago, OP welcomed the couple into their house rent-free to help them get back on their feet. The fact it was also close to the city they worked in didn't hurt.
As a generous landlord, he shouldered all expenses but had one simple rule: no major renovations. On a visit a year ago, it seemed like only a bit of painting had been done. Fair enough.
Fast forward to the present, and the house started to strain OP’s finances. Additionally, it became a constant reminder of their mother's absence, which made it a burdensome emotional anchor.
Offers from interested buyers were steadily pouring in, so the decision to sell seemed not only practical but necessary for OP’s mental well-being.
He broke the news to his daughter and gave her six months to find a new place—she didn’t take it too well. She revealed she and her husband had invested significantly in upgrades – redoing the stairs and the kitchen, and are currently midway through a bathroom renovation.
She accused OP of unfairly benefiting from their improvements, but they did ring it loud that there were to be no major renovations. Was OP the AH in this situation?
So, where does this leave OP? Torn between practicality and family loyalty, that’s where. Redditors believe the decision ultimately rests on how much value they place on helping their daughter versus their own well-being.
It's clear: the house is theirs, and selling it is within their rights. But whether they should – that’s a question only they can answer, balancing love for their daughter against their own mental and financial health.
What do you think about this story? Let us know in the comments.