OP's wife has traditional views about pets, considering larger dogs like their pit mix, Cabo, as "outside" dogs
[ ADVERTISEMENT ]
At a certain point, the dog consumes antifreeze. However, OP's spouse is burdened with numerous responsibilities, preventing her from being able to bring the dog to the veterinarian over the weekend.
The dog died alone the next day, and in pain on the porch.OP blames his partner for her neglect and her belief in "outside dogs."
OP is being overly critical
Both of the partners are at fault; they should've provided outdoor accommodations for the dog.
OP's wife's neglect of the dog is wrong, but considering OP has a child and a shared life, professional help is needed.
Both of them failed to prioritize an animal's well-being.
OP's wife seems swamped balancing work, a baby, and dogs
OP's anger is valid, but he has a child, and divorce isn't the answer.
OP's child's health is a priority, but the situation shouldn't have escalated to this point in the first place.
They both acted irresponsibly and didn't deserve to have pets.
In the future, OP should only consider getting a pet if he is able to provide personal care for it.
Both OP and his wife share some blame for what happened with Cabo, the dog. OP was worried about Cabo and thought his wife's idea of "outside dogs" caused problems.
But he needs to understand that his wife has a lot on her plate. She was looking after their baby, working from home, and taking care of two dogs.
When their baby had a scary allergic reaction, it made sense that she focused on the baby's health. That's the right thing to do.
In the future, if OP wants a pet, he should be ready to take care of it all by himself. Blaming others when things go wrong doesn't help. Instead, it's better to learn from this and make sure pets get the care they need.
Understanding each other's responsibilities can make life with pets happier and avoid problems like this one.