Man Confused By Girlfriend's View That Ordering Desert For Two And Eating It By Himself Is "Disrespectful To Restaurant"

"Am I the asshole for insisting on ordering a dessert meant for two people, even though I was going to eat it alone?"

Sophia

• Published in Interesting
• February 3, 2024

In a world full of different eating rules and food traditions, ordering a meal meant for several people and enjoying it alone usually causes no big fuss in the wide world of food habits. Basically, the suggested serving size or number of servings for a dish is just a recommendation made by the chef or the restaurant based on what they think is a normal amount to eat.

Choosing to treat yourself to a 'meal for two' by yourself should not be seen as breaking eating rules but more as a way to satisfy your own hunger and taste. This approach to food is especially relevant when looking at the Reddit story about a guy who wanted a "dessert for two" all to himself.

His decision, although not typical, isn't really wrong. Restaurants often serve big portions, and many people eat these all by themselves, especially in places where eating a lot is seen as a good thing.

Furthermore, in times when being yourself is often valued, making your eating experience your own by picking a bigger portion, no matter if it's meant for more people, shows your independence in making choices. The guy's choice to go for a bigger dessert, even though his girlfriend didn't like it, highlights a bigger trend where what you prefer to eat is more important than old-fashioned eating rules.

Just take a look at what happened here...

A couple dined out; OP insisted on ordering a dessert for two despite his girlfriend's objections about health and etiquette.

OP argued with their girlfriend about a dessert but didn't get it. They wonder if they were wrong for insisting on it alone, upsetting her.

Scroll down to see what people had to say...

Guess the dessert debate turned into a restaurant reputation crisis! NTA: Just a hungry patron with a sweet tooth!

How dare we appreciate their offerings and indulge a bit more? The nerve!

Ah, the agony of extra dollars! Who knew ordering dessert could be such a financial faux pas?

They reel us in with affordability, hoping we'll bite the expensive bait. Crafty, indeed!

Indulgence now, pleasure later! A sweet plan, indeed.

A little white lie for dessert? Who could resist?

Leftovers for lunch, or midnight munchies? The eternal debate in a nutshell!

Pajama Cake: Bringing dessert comfort to a couch near you!

From dessert to Reddit, who knew? Soft NTA: Relationship oasis ahead!

It's their plate, their fate!

The dessert debate, a riveting dinner theater for neighboring tables!

Dessert disparities: the sweet irony of dining dilemmas.

Dining, not policing! Bon appétit, not bon imposition!

In the restaurant arena, it's each fork for themselves! Let the plates decide, not the debates.

Dessert diplomacy: If it's the tastiest, it's the testiest topic! Let taste buds reign supreme.

Dessert drama: Sharing optional, taste mandatory! In the world of Italian dining, solo sharing is just second helpings.

Ordering freedom, not offense! Let taste buds, not tensions, rule the menu.

From dessert debates to relationship riddles: the plot thickens!

Dessert: the battlefield of love and health! Who knew a sweet tooth could stir such heart-wrenching debates?

In the end, the controversy over a dessert isn't just about sugar and calories; it's a delicious slice of life's bigger feast. After all, if you can't share a dessert meant for two, at least you can share the story—and that's a treat in itself!

Comment down your thoughts, or share this article for all your family and friends to see!

Sophia