Daycare Owner Reports Sister-In-Law for Operating Unqualified Childcare, Citing Moral Obligation

" We have never been close as she criticizes me for earning more than her brother and emasculating my husband who is a SAHD. "

Damjan

• Published in Interesting
• January 14, 2024

Dealing with family and work issues can be tricky. This story is about a 33-year-old woman who runs her daycare. She worked hard to get there, starting as a preschool teacher and then buying the place from her boss.

She made sure everything was legal and safe, getting all the right qualifications and checks for her and her staff. Her sister-in-law, Eve, is going through a tough time.

She split from her husband and has two 6-year-old twins. Eve decided to start her own childcare business by looking after her twins' friends after school.

She's doing this to make ends meet since she's got full custody and her freelance work isn't as steady as before. Eve asked OP to help promote her childcare service to the parents at her daycare.

But OP said no because Eve's business wasn't legal – she didn't have the necessary qualifications or safety checks. She even suggested Eve should do more freelance work instead of babysitting illegally.

The story heats up when OP finds out Eve is still running her childcare service. Feeling worried about the kids' safety, she reports Eve's business, and it gets shut down.

This causes a huge fight, with Eve calling her petty and accusing her of not helping her succeed. OP's husband is upset too.

He thinks she should have been more understanding since Eve is struggling with money and her ex isn't paying child support. OP stands by her decision, saying she'd do it again to keep the kids safe, but now she's got a family feud on her hands. Was she right to report Eve?

OP is a 33-year-old woman, and her relationship with her SIL is strained.

OP's SIL used to freelance but reduced work after divorce to spend more time with her twins, now starting a childminding business by picking up twins' friends after school.

She asked OP to promote her daycare business to parents at her daycare, but OP declined.

OP recently discovered that she's taken on more kids from the twins' classes and is still working as a childminder, so OP reported her anonymously, which resulted in her business being closed.

OP's husband disclosed his sister's troubles, but OP would have reported her regardless, as she was endangering the children under her care with her illegal activities.

Not qualified individuals should not work with children for various reasons.

Certifications and training are necessary for a reason, and OP made the correct choice.

Reporting her, regardless of personal conflicts, is essential.

No qualifications for childcare, no childcare capability.

OP should have a conversation with her husband to clarify her actions and intentions, emphasizing that she wasn't acting out of pettiness.

OP did the right thing by not cutting her slack, especially when it concerns the safety and well-being of children.

Operating an unlicensed in-home daycare is wrong.

It could be hazardous and a disaster waiting to happen and OP is not in the wrong.

Unfortunately, she's going through a tough time, but she made a mistake.

It is illegal and unsafe.

If someone isn't properly trained and certified, they shouldn't be allowed to take care of children. The rules and training exist for good reasons.

So, when OP reported her sister-in-law, Eve, for running an illegal daycare, she did the right thing, even though they had personal issues. OP needs to talk with her husband to explain that she wasn't trying to be mean. She was just worried about the kids' safety.

Running an unlicensed daycare is a big no-no. It's not just wrong; it can be really dangerous. Even though Eve is going through a tough time, her choice to run an illegal daycare was a mistake.

It's important to follow the rules and keep kids safe, and that's why OP did what she did.

Damjan