Woman Shares Absurd Babysitting Post From Online Forum - $100 For Five Nights A Week

"I can only afford 100$ a week"

Damjan

• Published in Interesting
• October 4, 2023

In the realm of online classifieds and community forums, it's not uncommon to stumble upon posts that leave you baffled, prompt an amused chuckle, or provoke an exasperated sigh. These posts introduce us to a unique group of individuals who, intentionally or unintentionally, make requests that defy the norms of fairness and reason.

Consider, for instance, a recent post seeking a babysitter. The request reads: "Babysitter wanted Mon-Fri 4 am to 1 pm. He's an easy kiddo, 1 and 5 months old, doesn't wake up until about 7-8 am, and takes a nap around 10-10:30.

So honestly, you'd only be watching him for three to four hours. But I can only afford $100 a week. If there's anyone interested or can help me, I'm really, really in need!!! I need you to start next week!!! I had a few people lined up, but they aren't messaging back!!!"

This particular post epitomizes the essence of unreasonable requests in various ways. Firstly, it undeniably undervalues the service being sought by offering a mere $100 a week for a demanding childcare schedule.

Additionally, it employs an emotional manipulation tactic, emphasizing the poster's desperation and urgency with the hope of tugging at the heartstrings of potential caregivers. Furthermore, the mention of previously lined-up candidates who have mysteriously gone silent hints at the realization, among others, that this request is far from reasonable.

Babysitter wanted

Some kind-hearted individuals are willing to help by babysitting at their place for $100, but asking them to leave their tasks at home is too demanding.

Some good people may help out for $100, but expecting them to leave their own homes for it is unreasonable

To attract a babysitter for such early hours, you'd need to offer higher pay, not lower.

This person can't afford to work; she should focus on taking care of their child themselves.

In reality, she doesn't have anyone lined up.

Finding a babysitter for those hours, even with good pay, would be extremely challenging.

This ad may attract the wrong childcare providers.

She should hire a homeless for a lower wage in exchange for accommodations and food.

Hiring someone questionable and paying them to come to your home is likely not a wise decision.

Someone willing to babysit your child for just $100 a week is probably not the best choice.

Given the hours, offering rent-free housing with a $100 incentive makes sense if the person can be home during those times

Expecting someone to leave their own home, wake up at the crack of dawn, and take on the responsibility of caring for a child for such meager compensation is simply not fair. While some kind-hearted individuals may be willing to help with childcare, it's important to recognize that their time and effort are valuable, and they deserve fair compensation.

Moreover, the idea of having "a few people lined up" who mysteriously disappeared into the digital ether is likely a tactic to manipulate potential caregivers into accepting the offer. In reality, finding a reliable babysitter for those hours, even with a more reasonable pay rate, would be a significant challenge.

The suggestion to hire someone questionable and offer them accommodations and food in exchange for a lower wage is a risky proposition. Trust and safety should be paramount when entrusting someone with the care of your child.

Damjan